arXiv (All)
open access
Mind the Spatial Gap: A Benchmark for Geospatial Reasoning and Constrained Spatial Editing
Understanding and manipulating spatial relations is fundamental to AI systems that reason about physical environments and construct grounded world models. However, existing evaluations of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) for spatial reasoning rely predominantly on static question-answering (
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Plan-Bench: Can Existing VLMs Go Well Beyond Perception to Reason and Plan in Embodied Worlds?#1344716
- ReTAC: Residual Test-Time Agentic Computation for Video Spatial Reasoning#1327905
- What Makes a Good Visual Representation for Spatial Understanding in MLLMs?#1343048
- PhySGA: A Physics-Space Grounded Agentic Framework for Generalizable and Interactive 3D Composition#1355478
- PhySGA: A Physics-Space Grounded Agentic Framework for Generalizable and Interactive 3D Composition#1336025
Record · ID 1296888
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive