arXiv (All)
open access
Provenance-Aware Belief Updating in Human-AI Feedback Loops
In repeated human-AI interaction, a single observation can be quoted, summarized, and returned to a model as multiple reports, making repetition look like independent corroboration. We study whether language models can use supplied report lineage to update according to evidence provenance rather tha
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EvoQuantLab: Training-Free Dual-Loop Evolution for Auditable Quantitative Research#1344694
- CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering#1109870
- Benchmarking and Training Reward Models for Cross-Source Evidence Grounding in Search Agents#1343033
- Verify Less, Evolve More: Training Idea-Level Critics for Verification-Efficient ML Evolving Agents#1233032
- SkillApt: Learning When to Activate Agent Skills from Counterfactual Evidence#1063074
Record · ID 1297360
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive