arXiv (All)
open access
Not All Correct Fixes Run Alike: An Empirical Study of Patch Performance in Repository-Level Issue Resolution
Repository-level issue-resolution benchmarks such as SWE-bench evaluate submitted patches primarily based on whether they pass the correctness tests, leaving the runtime performance of different test-passing patches largely unexplored. Evaluating patch performance is essential but challenging since
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Not All Correct Fixes Run Alike: An Empirical Study of Patch Performance in Repository-Level Issue Resolution#1291868
- Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation#1011704
- Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation#965480
- RubricRefine: Improving Tool-Use Agent Reliability with Training-Free Pre-Execution Refinement#987669
- Beyond Fixed Fault Models: Comparing LLM-Based and Rule-Based Fault Injection in OpenStack#986012
Record · ID 1297915
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive