IZA Discussion Papers
open access
DP18545: Strategic Reasoning and Sensitivity to Stakes in the Dictator and Ultimatum Games: LLMs vs. Human Proposers
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Measurement in the Ultimatum and Dictator Games: Construct validity, standardization and the problem of coordination.#988601
- Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games#612717
- Can LLMs Replace Economic Choice Prediction Labs? The Case of Language-based Persuasion Games#611240
- Game Theory, Indirect Modeling, and the Origin of Morality#748201
- Papers, Please and the systemic approach to engaging ethical expertise in videogames#734498
Record · ID 130035
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive