arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Safety Monitors Mostly Catch What the Model Already Refuses
Safety monitors are evaluated by recall on harmful prompts, regardless of whether the target model would answer them. Yet a monitor matters most on the prompts the model does answer. We measure recall on exactly those prompts, defined by sampling the target model and judging its responses. Across fo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Recall Is Not Protection: Evaluating Safety Monitors Against Model Compliance#973427
- Positive-Unlabeled Learning for Agent Safety False Alarm Auditing#1187603
- SameFact: The Same Safety Facts Lead to Different Responses Across Interfaces#1130714
- Understanding vigilance and its decrement: theoretical, contextual, and neural insights.#305305
- From Trait Vectors to Circuits: Tracing Refusal and Sycophancy Through Language Models#1036907
Record · ID 1319200
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive