ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Urethral Sterilization With Chlorhexidine Digluconate to Facilitate Primary Repair & Same-Session Implantation
The introduction of penile implants has revolutionized the management of male erectile dysfunction. However, a number of intraoperative complications may occur, which have a major impact on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction such as bleeding, infection and urethral injury. Patients undergoing penile implant surgery with fibrotic corpora (e.g., after priapism, after infection, or with Peyronie disease) have a higher risk rates of urethral perforation. This may be related to previous scarring, the difficultly in dilating scarred and fibrotic corpora and its inherent risk of corporal crossover and urethral perforation. This work examines the efficacy of pre-operative urethral sterilization in rendering the urethra as sterile as the skin of the genital area, with the skin sterilized as per the ISSM guidelines for penile prosthesis implantation, thereby allowing primary repair of urethral injuries should they occur, and implantation in the same setting, without a higher risk of infection. The study will involve 100 male patients undergoing aseptic surgery (regardless the procedure). Patients will be divided into two groups: Group 1: control group, n=50 Group 2: Chlorhexidine group (Ch group), n=50 Pre-operatively, urethral instillation with Chlorhexidine gel will be performed for the Ch group, while for the control group, instillation will not be performed. After conclusion of surgery and with the patient on the operative table, the following swabs will be obtained: * A penile skin swab. * A urethral swab. Skin and urethral swabs will be compared for bacterial colonization by culture and sensitivity, across the two groups.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Single-incision Sling vs Urethral Bulking During Prolapse Surgery for Occult Stress Incontinence#890016
- Comparative Outcomes of Subtunical Microdissection and Grafting Versus Classical Plaque Incision and Grafting in Complex Peyronie's Disease#869082
- Intra-operative Neuromodulation of the Pelvic Plexus#1009942
- Human Penile Tissue Allotransplantation for Devastating Penile and Concomitant Genital Trauma#1198625
- Long-term Surgical Treatment Outcome of Peri-implantitis Lesions#1138947
Record · ID 1320519
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive