ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single-incision Sling vs Urethral Bulking During Prolapse Surgery for Occult Stress Incontinence
The aim is to compare outcomes of two different procedures to prevent occult stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients who are having pelvic organ prolapse surgeries
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Laparoscopic Suture Versus Mesh Rectopexy for the Treatment of Persistent Complete Rectal Prolapse in Children#1088559
- Trial of Void With Saline Bladder Instillation#1127722
- Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures#1111618
- Transperineal Ultrasonography in Stress Urinary Incontinence#966253
- A Pilot Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Partially Absorbable Mesh in Patients With Pelvic Organ Prolapsed#1047697
Record · ID 890016
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive