ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Transnasal and Oral Gastroscopy.
Two groups of patients were randomised into two groups of either transnasal gastroscopy or conventional type gastroscopy (n=98). The aim of the study was to evaluate the cardiorespiratory effects and sideeffects of the two methods, and to evaluate the technical features of the transnasal endoscope.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation in Limited Mouth Opening Patient#897149
- Early Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Performed Bedside Using Single-use Disposable Endoscope#1087601
- Comparative Effectiveness of Endoscopic Assessment of Gastroesophageal Reflux and Barretts Esophagus#1197224
- High-flow Nasal Oxygenation Versus Standard Oxygenation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy With Sedation in Obese Patients#1350152
- Functional Endoscopy in Neurogenic Dysphagia#846205
Record · ID 1322880
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive