arXiv (All)
open access
Do AI chatbots find what experts would? Effects of model, user role, and sample size on study retrieval for medical questions
Large language model (LLM) chatbots are increasingly used to answer clinical questions with citations to relevant studies, yet the quality of retrieved evidence and factors influencing study selection remain unclear. We evaluated three general-purpose LLM chatbots (Claude Sonnet 5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do AI chatbots find what experts would? Effects of model, user role, and sample size on study retrieval for medical questions#1319197
- Toward Workflow-Aware Benchmarking for Healthcare NLP Agents#819752
- Toward Workflow-Aware Benchmarking for Healthcare NLP Agents#809756
- Effectiveness of AI-Assisted Clinical Documentation#1010022
- The use of chatbots as interventions for mental health conditions: scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.#975519
Record · ID 1324422
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive