arXiv (All)
open access
Refuses in Chat, Complies with Arms: LLM Refusal Does Not Survive Robot Control
Frontier language models reliably refuse to explain how to cause physical harm. We ask whether this refusal survives when the same models control a robot. We introduce RoboHarm, a physical AI safety benchmark of harmful robot instructions, and test seven frontier models on it. We hold each model fix
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Persona Following Is Not Selective Control: The Neutrality Gap in LLM User Simulation#1129639
- Large Language Models for Model-Based Robot Design#1118135
- G2-Nav: Grounded and Guarded Vision-Language Costmaps for Robot Social Navigation#1156431
- Human-Robot Interaction and Perceived Irrationality: A Study of Trust Dynamics and Error Acknowledgment#974146
- CVE-2026-107582 — MEDIUM 6.5#1267455
Record · ID 1324644
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive