arXiv (All)
open access
SkillForgeBench: Evaluating Agent Reliability Grounded in Agent Skill Specifications
Evaluating an agent's ability to strictly satisfy diverse and procedurally complex requirements is essential to determining its practical reliability. Conducting such an evaluation demands agentic tasks that reconcile broad domain coverage with deep procedural complexity. Existing paradigms face a f
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TRUSS: Towards Task-Reliable and User-Safe Automated Agent Skill Generation#463287
- Why Static Skill Inconsistencies Do Not Equate to Runtime Risks: A Behavioral Analysis of LLM Agent Execution#1344750
- SpecGuardBench: Can Coding Agents Construct Reliable Validation Harnesses from Natural Language Specifications?#1341752
- SpecGuardBench: Can Coding Agents Construct Reliable Validation Harnesses from Natural Language Specifications?#1319099
- A Theory of Reliable Self-Evolution for Agent Harnesses#1306350
Record · ID 1325814
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive