arXiv (All)
open access
Why Static Skill Inconsistencies Do Not Equate to Runtime Risks: A Behavioral Analysis of LLM Agent Execution
LLM agent frameworks heavily rely on external skill assets to standardize tool usage, encode operational workflows, and supply executable runtime resources. Despite their widespread adoption, multi-component skill packages frequently suffer from cross-artifact inconsistencies, where documentation, s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SkillForgeBench: Evaluating Agent Reliability Grounded in Agent Skill Specifications#1325814
- SkillSandbox: Skill Verification via Dynamic Scenario Synthesis#1234455
- Stealth Apart, Harm Together: Skill Cascading Attacks on Skill-Based Agent Systems#1104582
- AgentTune: A Unified Training Lifecycle for Tool-Using LLM Agents#1297687
- SkillJuror: Measuring How Agent Skill Organization Changes Runtime Behavior#271931
Record · ID 1344750
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive