arXiv (All)
open access
Truncation Samplers Are Nested: Comparing Decoding Rules Is a Measurement Problem
Settling one comparison between two truncation samplers has cost six thousand A100-hours, and nothing says in advance how far apart two samplers can be. We observe that almost every deployed truncation rule keeps a prefix of the probability-sorted vocabulary, so any two such rules are nested at ever
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hesitation-Aware On-Policy Distillation for Diffusion Language Models#1118013
- Tail-Replay: Escaping the Curse of Linear Attention in Prefix Caching for Hybrid LLMs#799522
- Tail-Replay: Escaping the Curse of Linear Attention in Prefix Caching for Hybrid LLMs#798099
- Where Activation Sparsity and KV-Cache Sparsity Cross in LLM Decoding#1118962
- Decision-Aware Suffix Prediction and Reasoning of Business Processes#973771
Record · ID 1326820
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive