arXiv (All)
open access
More Reasoning Is Not Always Better: Executing Clinical Guidelines with LLMs and Rules
Large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable promise in clinical decision support. However, existing approaches often rely on multi-step reasoning or multi-agent collaboration to execute clinical guidelines, introducing substantial computational overhead without reliably preventing decision
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Verdict: Agentic Code Judging with Verifiable Feedback#1344257
- Beyond the Verdict: Agentic Code Judging with Verifiable Feedback#1319062
- RuleTrek: Benchmarking Agentic Rule Reasoning in Complex Scenarios#1354387
- CodePori: Large-Scale System for Autonomous Software Development Using Multi-Agent Technology#1199619
- You're Hired: Strategic Model Selection for LLM Collaboration#1143417
Record · ID 1327162
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive