ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Artificial Intelligence-Generated vs Academician-Developed Multiple True/False Questions in Anesthesiology Education
This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and educational value of artificial intelligence (AI)-generated multiple true/false questions compared to those developed by experienced academicians in anesthesiology training. A total of 27 anesthesiology residents will be included in the study. Question sets consisting of 200 multiple true/false items will be created, with half generated by academicians and the other half generated using an artificial intelligence model (ChatGPT-based system). The questions will be based on standardized educational materials from the anesthesiology training curriculum. Participants will complete the test in a single session. Each correct answer will be scored as one point, and total scores will be calculated. In addition to test performance, item difficulty, discrimination indices, and test reliability will be analyzed. Furthermore, participants' perceptions regarding question quality will be evaluated. The study aims to determine whether AI-generated questions can provide a reliable and effective alternative to traditional question development methods in medical education and contribute to more objective and standardized assessment processes.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinicians' Perspectives on Pre-Anaesthetic Assessment and Their Attitudes Towards AI-Supported Models: Protocol for an International Survey of Anaesthesia Personnel.#630915
- Knowledge About Anaesthesiology and Anaesthesiologists#880214
- Fine-Tuned Large Language Models for Generating Multiple-Choice Questions in Anesthesiology: Psychometric Comparison With Faculty-Written Items / Carlos Ramon Hölzing, Charlotte Meynhardt, Patrick Meybohm, Sarah König, Peter Kranke#783909
- Using randomization to compare AI and expert-generated formative assessment questions in medical education.#172147
- Implementation of a Computer-based Questionnaire for Preoperative Evaluation in Anesthesia Ambulance#917283
Record · ID 1337955
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive