PubMed
open access
CC BY-NC 4.0
Using randomization to compare AI and expert-generated formative assessment questions in medical education.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative analysis of short answer questions and multiple-choice questions in formative assessment of first-year medical students.#1091054
- Large language model prompt engineering for medical education: A practical guide for the Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists Final Examination.#988756
- Establishment of a Predictive System for Perioperative Risk Assessment and Electronic Flowcharting Response Strategies in Thoracic Surgery#857493
- CoTAL: Human-in-the-Loop Prompt Engineering for Generalizable Formative Assessment Scoring and Feedback#1082939
- Rebuilding ability acquisition in medical imaging teaching: a multi-level AI-driven teaching paradigm based on cognitive-information theory.#165716
Record · ID 172147
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive