ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laparoscopic Extended View Totally Extra Peritoneal (e.TEP) in Comparison to Traditional TEP Technique for Inguinal Hernia Repair
The aim of this prospective randomized clinical study is to compare effectiveness, feasibility and outcome between total extra peritoneal (TEP) and extended TEP (E-TEP) techniques in repair of inguinal hernia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Recurrence and Patient Satisfaction After Laparoscopic Hernia Repair With Intraperitoneal Onlay-mesh (IPOM)#1231893
- Safety and Efficacy of the 3DMax™ MID Anatomical Mesh (BD, USA) in Laparoscopic-endoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair - Multicenter, Prospective Observational Study#968838
- Is it Necessary to Fix Mesh in Laparoscopic Hernia Repair#1072510
- Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique#834743
- Does the Mesh Have to be Fixed in Laparoscopic eTEP Repair of Inguinal Hernia?#1337071
Record · ID 1338256
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive