ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) and Lichtenstein Technique
Open tension-free mesh repair (Lichtenstein) and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair are the most commonly preferred techniques for inguinal hernia surgery. There's still a debate going on about which of these two techniques (open versus laparoscopic) is effective. This prospective randomized study aimed at comparing the early and long-term results of these two techniques (TEP vs. Lichtenstein).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Trial to Compare TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) vs TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) y Approach for Women's Inguinal Hernia on an Outpatient Basis#851562
- Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain#903948
- Comparison of Mesh Fixation and Non-Fixation in eTEP#868099
- Comparison Between Elliptical Domed Mesh Technique and Lichtenstein Technique in Inguinal Hernia#801424
- Onstep Versus Lichtenstein, the Onli Trial.#1074742
Record · ID 834743
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive