ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Patient Satisfaction of Glazed IPS Empress CAD Versus Glazed Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers
The most frequent reason for failure of laminate veneers made of glass ceramics (feldspathic, leucite based and lithium silicate based ceramics) was fracture of the ceramic, Therefore, ceramic materials that have higher fracture resistance, especially for patients suffering from abnormal occlusion, are needed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- One Year Clinical Evaluation of IPS Empress CAD Versus Polished Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers#842973
- Clinical Evaluation of Lava Digital Veneer System (DVS) Crowns#1362232
- Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities#912683
- Avaliação da topografia superficial de cerâmicas submetidas a diferentes tratamentos de superfície#935344
- One Year Clinical Evaluation of Conservative Versus Conventional Ceramic Onlays#878362
Record · ID 1339059
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive