arXiv (All)
open access
The belief-action gap in language model agents
Language model (LM) agents can fail for different reasons, requiring different explanations and interventions. We study how state beliefs, action values, and action preferences interact as LM agents reason and commit to decisions in text-rendered grid worlds. We estimate task-relevant beliefs using
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Consistency Without Alignment: Item-Sensitive Language Models Indistinguishable From Random#820011
- GRUET: Quantifying Uncertainty of Agentic Reasoning-and-Acting Processes#1051230
- GRUET: Quantifying Uncertainty of Agentic Reasoning-and-Acting Processes#1028745
- LSR-Ben: A Logical and Scientific Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Process Reward Models#1143744
- Reasoning or Rambling? Exploring the Effect of Thinking on Agent Persuasion#799887
Record · ID 1342661
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive