arXiv (All)
open access
Same Attack, Different Judge: A First Controlled Adversarial Comparison of Jev, LLM Judges, and Purpose-Built Safety Classifiers
TypeSafe AI's Jev is a new kind of safety judge. It generates no text and no label: it answers questions the developer defines in advance and returns a probability for each answer. The vendor admits that adversarial input can change these answers but gives no numbers. In this paper, we present the f
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Same Attack, Different Judge: A First Controlled Adversarial Comparison of Jev, LLM Judges, and Purpose-Built Safety Classifiers#1318895
- Who Judges the Judges? A Chinese Safety QA Benchmark for Evaluating LLM Responses and Safety Judges#1069903
- Proceedings of the Workshop on Artificial Intelligence Safety 2022 (AISafety 2022) co-located with the Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Twenty-Fifth European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-ECAI-2022), Vienna, Austria, July 24-25, 2022.#489549
- REA: From Correct LLM Judgments to Safe Decision Delivery#1342689
- Risk of What? Defining Harm in the Context of AI Safety#688794
Record · ID 1343027
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive