arXiv (All)
open access
Chain of Thought Monitoring Can Fail Even When CoT Is Necessary
Chain of Thought (CoT) monitoring is used by frontier labs to detect misbehaviour of AI systems. Yet, its reliability remains poorly understood. We attribute this to the lack of a successful organizing principle that leads to generalizable conclusions about monitoring reliability in different regime
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A False Average: Pooled CoT-Monitor Accuracy Conceals a Reasoning-Dependent Fragility#999835
- AutoControl Arena: Synthesizing Executable Test Environments for Frontier AI Risk Evaluation#1297058
- Epistemological Debt: Cognitive Atrophy and Systemic Collapse in AI-Dependent Software Engineering#629993
- Epistemological Debt: Cognitive Atrophy and Systemic Collapse in AI-Dependent Software Engineering#628131
- Mental-Models for Multi-Agent Systems#1249877
Record · ID 1343296
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive