arXiv (All)
open access
A False Average: Pooled CoT-Monitor Accuracy Conceals a Reasoning-Dependent Fragility
Chain-of-thought (CoT) monitors are reported by their aggregate accuracy on a pool of reward hacks. We show that this number is a false average. On Terminal Wrench, about 77% of hacks are given away by the actions alone, and the monitor's pooled accuracy is dominated by them; on the remaining 23%, w
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Answer Confidence: A Controlled Audit of Self-Knowledge in a Black-Box Decision Model#1155941
- Elaboration Drift: How Human–LLM Interaction Erodes Epistemic Traction#91604
- Cognitive Bias Paradigms as Dimensional Probes: A Structural Typology of What the Heuristics-and-Biases Literature Was Actually Measuring#691841
- Costs and Benefits of Realism and Optimism#702386
- On the Limits of Metacognitive Monitoring in LLMs#1129477
Record · ID 999835
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive