arXiv (All)
open access
Jev-ToM: Evaluating Theory of Mind in Typed Decision Models
Dialogue and collaborative assistants repeatedly judge what a partner knows, believes, or intends. Typed decision models offer a potential alternative to generative large language models for bounded Theory of Mind (ToM) selection. We present Jev-ToM, comparing five typed decision models and seven ge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Typed Decision Models: An Early Evidence Audit and Evaluation Checklist#1116491
- On cognitive systems and their logic#688976
- Collaborative Theory of Mind: Learning to Self-Revise by Anticipating User Responses#1296879
- ChatGPT, metacognitive processes and syntactic complexity : an overview of LLMs usage and its impact on writing in the EFL classroom#672488
- Proactive AI: From Turns to Replannable Dialogue Timelines#1201172
Record · ID 1344110
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive