ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Classical Prosthesis and Silicone Prosthesis
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of classical Chopart prosthesis and silicone prosthesis on socket comfort, satisfaction level and quality of life in patients with unilateral Chopart amputation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical Evaluation of the Access Socket Flexible Socket for Transtibial Prosthesis#878995
- Effects of Pin and Vacuum Assisted Suspension Systems#1171467
- Asymmetry of the Center of Pressure During Gait After Amputation of Lower Limbs#904131
- Bone Physiology & Mechanics in Osteomyoplasty Amputation Rehabilitation#1195062
- The Effect of Using Two Different Prosthetic Feet in Patients With Unilateral Transtibial Amputation#853965
Record · ID 1351891
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive