arXiv (All)
open access
Ideological Bias in LLMs' Economic Causal Reasoning
and-scienceartificial-intelligencecomputation-and-languagecomputational-engineeringeconomicsfinancegeneral-economicsmachine-learning
Do large language models (LLMs) exhibit systematic ideological bias when reasoning about economic causal effects? As LLMs are increasingly used in policy analysis and economic reporting, where directionally correct causal judgments are essential, this question has direct practical stakes. We present
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Monocultural Biases: Correlated biases in large language models lead to unequal systemic exclusion rates in hiring#1036852
- Causal Inference for Sequential Settings under Interference and Latent Confounding#373395
- Bias in Large Language Models: Origin, Evaluation, and Mitigation#189222
- The Estimation of Causal Effects from Observational Data#485593
- Blameocracy: Causal Rhetoric in Politics#820194
Record · ID 1354148
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive