arXiv (All)
open access
One Monitor Does Not Fit All: Formalism-Agnostic Runtime Verification for Agentic AI
Agentic AI systems combine model decisions, mutable state, tool calls, and delegation to external agents. Monitoring them requires observations from different execution boundaries, while prevention requires control before an operation produces its effect. We present AgenticRV, a runtime-verification
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When Should Users Check? Modeling Confirmation Frequency in Multi-Step Agentic AI Tasks#1122956
- The Agentic AI Framework (AAIF): a policy-enforced architecture for accountable and high-performance intrusion detection.#295441
- The reach of a verification tool decides its value: A controlled study of verification surface, artifact quality, and cost in AI coding agents#622630
- Measurement Without Validity: The Compounding Reliability Problem in Agentic AI Evaluation#999836
- Silent Failures in Agent-Tool Interaction: An Audit of ToolUniverse#1063047
Record · ID 1354501
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive