arXiv (All)
open access
Why 3D Reconstruction Breaks Down on Under-Ice AUV Video, and How to Predict It
Reconstruction of 3D structures using under-ice AUV video footage has been inaccurate, although it is not certain whether this is due to shortcomings in the methods or an inherent deficiency of the capture system. We test four different models for reconstruction on the same Antarctic under-ice AUV v
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SAM 3D Animal: Promptable Animal 3D Reconstruction from Images in the Wild#1248429
- The recent enhancement of the surface melt over the Antarctic Peninsula dictated by thermodynamics#684717
- Evaluating methods to estimate the water equivalent of new snow from daily snow depth recordings#452010
- Carbonate compensation depth (CCD) reconstruction of the equatorial Pacific#320032
- The Glacier Model Intercomparison Project (GlacierMIP): Towards standardisation of global glacier projections#1357660
Record · ID 1354674
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive