arXiv (All)
open access
ChaosBench-Logic v2: Evaluating LLM Logical Reasoning over Dynamical Systems at Scale
Standard accuracy on binary reasoning benchmarks hides critical failure modes: prior collapse, inconsistency under paraphrase, and inability to reason about parameter-dependent dynamics. We present ChaosBench-Logic v2, a 40,886-question benchmark over 165 dynamical systems with 27 FOL predicates and
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- EvoMaestro: Toward Interpretable and Steerable LLM-Driven Program Evolution#1198995
- Filtered Reasoning Score: Evaluating Reasoning Quality on a Model's Most-Confident Traces#1234769
- Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems#793925
- Repair or Resample? Rethinking Failure Debugging in LLM Multi-Agent Systems#789906
- Characterizing Overconfident Failure in LLM-Based Code Generation#1257961
Record · ID 1355580
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive