arXiv (All)
open access
DeSpatial: The devil of Agentic Spatial Reasoning Lies in 3D Itself
Spatial agents have access to reconstruction and segmentation tools, yet inconsistent predictions and fragmented object identities can prevent their outputs from becoming reliable 3D scene information. A simple oracle experiment exposes this perception bottleneck: replacing tool-predicted perception
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Mind the Spatial Gap: A Benchmark for Geospatial Reasoning and Constrained Spatial Editing#1296888
- SceneTeract: Probing and Improving Agent-Aware Activity Reasoning in 3D Indoor Scenes#1014650
- PhySGA: A Physics-Space Grounded Agentic Framework for Generalizable and Interactive 3D Composition#1355478
- PhySGA: A Physics-Space Grounded Agentic Framework for Generalizable and Interactive 3D Composition#1336025
- RSure-Agent: Reliable Use of Tool Observations for Remote Sensing Agents#1200487
Record · ID 1356326
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive