arXiv (All)
open access
PremiseCheck: Efficient Fact-Checking of Human and AI Peer Reviews
Peer review is under strain from the growth of submissions, and review comments written by humans or AI can misstate what a paper says. We introduce ReviewFact, a benchmark that labels such factual errors in review comments under one definition across NLP, machine learning, and the natural sciences,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Althea: The Fact-Checking--Metalearning Tradeoff in AI-Assisted Verification#1049753
- HalluPeer: A Taxonomy-driven Benchmark for Detecting Hallucinations in Scientific Peer Reviews#926487
- One-Sided Verification Under Limited Expert Review#1343280
- Counterfactual Explanations and the Scope of Contestability#725946
- Needs Your Help: Understanding Platform-Directed Rating Participation in Community Notes on X#1011795
Record · ID 1356382
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive