arXiv (All)
open access
HalluPeer: A Taxonomy-driven Benchmark for Detecting Hallucinations in Scientific Peer Reviews
The growing scale of academic peer review has motivated the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as review assistants, yet LLMs can generate fluent but unsupported claims that undermine review reliability. Existing hallucination benchmarks are not designed for peer review, where verification requires
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform#1129367
- More Than Mimicking Reviewers: Evaluating LLMs for Pre-Submission Peer Review#973418
- PRISMA-LLM: An Empirical Reporting Framework for AI-Assisted Systematic Reviews#1069958
- Reviewer Agreement and Phrase-Based Profiles#692141
- CAAFC: Chronological Actionable Automated Fact-Checker for misinformation / non-factual hallucination detection and correction#178910
Record · ID 926487
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive