arXiv (All)
open access
Entertain, then Cancel: How Thinking Makes Reasoning Models Read Some and Or Literally
When a speaker says ``some students passed'', listeners infer that not all of them did. Reasoning models now let users decide how long a model thinks before it answers, but we do not know what extra thinking does to such everyday inferences. We study this directly: we keep a model's weights fixed, c
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- An Incomplete Loop: Deductive, Inductive, and Abductive Reasoning in Language Models#1108898
- Dual-process theory and decision-making in large language models#1078447
- Thinking effort aligns between humans and reasoning models in abductive reasoning#822288
- Spontaneous thought as attentional competition#434905
- Perceptions to Beliefs: Exploring Precursory Inferences for Theory of Mind in Large Language Models#454674
Record · ID 1356540
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive