arXiv (All)
open access
AI Alignment From Social Choice Perspectives
Alignment from human feedback uses human judgments about model outputs to steer the behavior of language models after pretraining. When those judgments reflect conflicting views of desirable behavior, the learned objective becomes an aggregate determination of what the model should prefer. We survey
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Revealed Preferences#971869
- ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs#1142861
- AI Alignment through a Game-theoretic Lens: A Survey#820654
- DIAL: Position-Debiased LLM Judges with Adaptive Human Preference Calibration#1105773
- From Observation to Intervention: Identifiability of Latent User Bias in Human-AI Interaction#1297537
Record · ID 1357210
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive