arXiv (All)
open access
AI Alignment through a Game-theoretic Lens: A Survey
As large language models and increasingly capable AI agents are deployed in high-risk settings, aligning them with complex human values has become a central challenge. Existing alignment methods, while effective in improving helpfulness, harmlessness, and controllability, often struggle to capture r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ContextAdapt: Evaluating Contextual Adaptation and Value Alignment in LLMs#1142861
- Moral Disagreement and the Limits of AI Value Alignment: a dual challenge of epistemic justification and political legitimacy#113449
- The Alignment Tax: How Safety Training Creates Operationally Lethal AI Systems#248522
- The Neutral Mask: How Alignment Training Provides Shallow Alignment while Leaving Partisan Structure Intact in a Large Language Model#1013586
- Towards Multi-modal Multi-turn Safety: From Agentic Interaction to Strategic Alignment#925888
Record · ID 820654
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive