arXiv (All)
open access
Retrieved but Not Read: Understanding Why Search-Augmented LLMs Fail to Use Available Evidence
Web search allows LLMs to access up-to-date information, but it remains unclear why they sometimes produce outdated answers even when relevant evidence is available. To study this problem, we construct temporal facts whose values changed after the models' training cutoffs. We evaluate one proprietar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evidence-Inference Reconstruction: When The Evidence Is Recalled But The Reasoning Goes Wrong#1118851
- Knowledge Integrity in Large Language Models: A State-of-The-Art Review#1133654
- A Removal Based Approach to Improve LLM Faithfulness at Test-Time#927639
- PRISM Edit: One Vector for All Temporal Answers#798998
- PRISM Edit: One Vector for All Temporal Answers#797584
Record · ID 1357386
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive