Conceptio › Archive › CanLII
CanLII metadata only

Google Canada Corporation v. Canada (Commissioner of Competition)

CanLII (Federation of Law Societies of Canada)
CanLII · Legal
Open Source ↗
appealscanadacanadiancase-lawdiscoveryevidencefcaprocedure
Decided: 2026-10-14. Docket: A-147-26. Citation: 2026 FCA 173 (CanLII). Procedure — Discovery — Relevance, materiality, proportionality — Whether refused discovery questions were properly assessed beyond logical relevance — Materiality and proportionality applied under Federal Courts Rules incorporated by Competition Tribunal Rules, Rule 34 — Tribunal considered cumulative burden and case needs — No reviewable error shown — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Appeals — Standard of review — Whether appellants identified an extricable legal error in discovery rulings — Application of Housen v. Nikolaisen and Vavilov to mixed fact and law — Palpable and overriding error threshold emphasised — Tribunal afforded margin of appreciation as master of its own procedure — Appeal dismissed | Evidence — Pr
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1359987
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive