OSF
open access
The Ability of Generative Artificial Intelligence to Evaluate the Quality of Scholarly Output
large-language-modelslibrary-and-information-sciencemetasciencepsychologysocial-and-behavioral-sciences
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being considered as tools to support the peer-review process. However, we currently have a limited understanding of their capabilities and biases in this area. In a set of three studies, we examined how out-of-the box LLMs evaluate scientific quality whe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large Language Model Turnover Undermines Screening for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Scientific Writing#1248879
- AdaTutoRank: Learning to Rerank Document Sets via Adaptive Tutoring Optimization for RAG and Deep Research#1116803
- Can We Believe AI Peer Review?#1345162
- Mining Meaning: Measurement Error in AI-Assisted Literature Reviews#1064230
- Academic Publishing in the Age of Generative AI#390102
Record · ID 1360410
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive