arXiv (All)
open access
Mining Meaning: Measurement Error in AI-Assisted Literature Reviews
Researchers increasingly use generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), to automate tasks across the research pipeline. We study the reliability of these tools at the reading, classification, and synthesis of large bodies of academic literature. We frame LLM-assisted literature review
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SumRank: Aligning Summarization Models for Long-Document Listwise Reranking#998158
- Searching smarter, not harder: leveraging AI to enhance literature searches for theory-driven reviews-A methodological case study.#756
- LitReview Arena: Evaluating Literature Review Agents with Battle-Style Peer Review Platform#1129367
- SciLitBench: Benchmark and Design Principles for LLM-Powered Systematic Literature Reviews#972566
- Checkpoints Are Not Enough: Trust Calibration in CoSLR, a Human-AI System for Systematic Literature Reviews#1036931
Record · ID 1064230
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive