Conceptio › Archive › CanLII
CanLII metadata only

Ballantyne v. Ballantyne

CanLII (Federation of Law Societies of Canada)
CanLII · Legal
Open Source ↗
administrative-lawcanadacanadiancase-lawcostscourt-opinionevidenceindigenous-peoples
Decided: 2026-10-15. Docket: T-2403-24. Citation: 2026 FC 1268 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — Vavilov framework — Whether the Appeal Tribunal’s decision was reasonable and intelligible — Reasons-first review for justification, transparency and intelligibility, Mason v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) cited — Failure to explain how irregularities reasonably affected outcome — Application for judicial review allowed, matter remitted | Indigenous peoples — First Nation elections — Election Code — Material effect on results — Whether procedural irregularities were tied to votes likely affecting the result — Burden to show variances likely affected result, Whitford v Red Pheasant First Nation and Opitz v Wrzesnewskyj cited — “Magic number” test argued, Tri
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1368049
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive