Springer Nature OA
open access
Conclusions
In this final chapter, we first look back and survey the landscape of argument mining (AM) research that we have covered in all the preceding chapters (Sect. 11.1). Then we look forward by pointing to areas and aspects of AM that may become more important in the future (Sect. 11.2), before we reflec
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation#1134026
- Annotation for computational argumentation analysis: Issues and perspectives#823895
- Designing and Analysing Argument Mining Pipelines: Towards a Comprehensive Assessment#1062235
- Argumentation Schemes. History, Classifications, and Computational Applications#355288
- Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation#737362
Record · ID 1374677
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive