Springer Nature OA
open access
Argumentative Language
artificial-intelligencecomputational-linguisticscomputer-sciencedata-mining-and-knowledge-discoverynatural-language-processing-nlpstatistics
In this chapter, we consider the linguistic side of argumentation: What does the language of arguing look like, and how does it differ from other ways of speaking or writing? The chapter thus is intended to serve primarily as background for readers who approach argument mining originally from a tech
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AMELIA: A Family of Multi-task End-to-end Language Models for Argumentation#1134026
- Conclusions#1374677
- Implementation of Argumentation as Process in Theoretical Linguistics#738384
- Argumentation: A Brief Introduction#716560
- Problems in Argument Analysis and Evaluation#737362
Record · ID 1374696
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive