arXiv (All)
open access
A Plausible Explanation Is Enough to Mislead Multimodal Judges
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) increasingly serve as judges in training and evaluation pipelines, often assessing answers together with explanations. Although AI judges are sensitive to textual factors, it remains unclear whether ordinary plausible explanations can sway judgments requiring
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Same evidence, different judgments: Evidence noncommutative in vision/speech-text conflicts#1063197
- The Age of Curiosity Meets the Age of AI: Benchmarking Child Safety in Large Language Models#925163
- The Age of Curiosity Meets the Age of AI: Benchmarking Child Safety in Large Language Models#920928
- What Counts as Evidence? Epistemic Cue Utilization in Large Language Models#1296795
- Redemption Score: A Multi-Modal Evaluation Framework for Image Captioning via Distributional, Perceptual, and Linguistic Signal Triangulation#1013419
Record · ID 1386603
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive