arXiv (All)
open access
Introducing multiverse analysis to bibliometrics: The case of team size effects on disruptive research
Although bibliometrics has become an essential tool in the evaluation of research performance, bibliometric analyses are sensitive to a range of methodological choices. Subtle choices in data selection, indicator construction, and modeling decisions can substantially alter results. Ensuring robustne
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines#977343
- How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines#976772
- BIP! Ranker: A Software Library for Citation-Based Impact Indicators on Large-Scale Graphs#1327480
- Bibliometric analysis of publications on professional development in the Scopus database#726918
- A Bibliometric Analysis of Disaster Nursing and Management Research: Global Trends, Key Insights, and Future Directions (1980-2024)#642510
Record · ID 1386915
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive