arXiv (All)
open access
Do AI Activity Indices Really Measure AI Activity?
AI dashboards increasingly shape economic debate, yet their headline movements often conceal what changed. For a ratio, the same rise can reflect numerator growth, denominator decline, or both. This ambiguity creates structural non-identification: adding observations or richer fixed effects cannot r
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The “Double-Edged Sword” Effect of Artificial Intelligence: Inverted U-Shaped Impact on New Quality Productive Forces and Its Underlying Mechanisms#26458
- The Many Morals of AI: The cautionary bias of North American news narratives in global perspective#1344074
- Does the AI Productivity Dividend Diminish? Does the AI Productivity Dividend Diminish? A Validated Framework for Identifying the Shape of Firm-Level Returns to Artificial Intelligence#1201642
- Task Curvature and AI Growth Accounting: A Pass-Through Correction to Task-Based Productivity Models#390595
- Trusting AI to increase productivity? Perspectives Across the Global North and South#363338
Record · ID 1388537
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive