arXiv (All)
open access
Coopshift: Post-Training Amplifies The Memory Curse In LLM Cooperation
How does post-training change cooperation during repeated interaction? Within each of seven released model lineages, we compare pretrained (Base), supervised fine-tuned (SFT), and subsequent preference- or reward-optimized (Aligned) checkpoints across seven social dilemmas. Copies of each checkpoint
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PopGen: Generating Semantically Diverse Populations for Zero-Shot Coordination#1327559
- Leadership as Coordination Control: Behavioral Signatures and the Recovery-Advantage Boundary in Multi-Agent LLM Teams#287174
- Taxing working memory shifts the balance from goals to stimulus-response habits#194911
- Climbing the Hill: Prompt Injection Red-Teaming Against Frontier Models with Curriculum Reinforcement Learning#1118340
- Drivers of LLM Consensus Formation Under Competing Incentives: A Simulation Study#1355131
Record · ID 1388652
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive