arXiv (All)
open access
Towards Human-AI Complementarity for AI Safety
Safely overseeing AI is increasingly challenging for the humans doing it, as they must evaluate longer and more complex outputs with every new model generation. To mitigate this challenge, we could leverage complementarity: where humans and models make different mistakes, combining their judgements
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Agentic Microphysics: A Manifesto for Generative AI Safety#19044
- Defensive Sufficiency in a Stackelberg Model of AI Security#1234259
- Defensive Sufficiency in a Stackelberg Model of AI Security#1227255
- Trustworthy RAG: An Evaluation Agent for Detecting Misinformation and Knowledge Poisoning in Generative AI Systems#662268
- Trustworthy RAG: An Evaluation Agent for Detecting Misinformation and Knowledge Poisoning in Generative AI Systems#661218
Record · ID 1389915
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive