arXiv (All)
open access
Don't Judge an Agent by Its Messages: Private-State Leakage under Passive Monitoring of Agent Communication
An AI agent can reproduce the distribution of its messages and of the receiver's task outcomes while disclosing private information that the task never required. We ask what a passive audit can certify when the auditor knows the authorised sender and the exact observable law but has no trusted pairi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Don't Judge an Agent by Its Messages: Private-State Leakage under Passive Monitoring of Agent Communication#1381167
- Probabilistic Agents in Deterministic Audits: Evaluating Multi-Agent Systems for Automated Audits Based on the German IT-Grundschutz#306960
- When can we trust untrusted monitoring? A safety case sketch across collusion strategies#1049757
- Certifying information flow in multi-agent behaviours#1388005
- One Monitor Does Not Fit All: Formalism-Agnostic Runtime Verification for Agentic AI#1354501
Record · ID 1389978
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive