arXiv CS
open access
Present but Hard to Read: Probing Latent Reasoning with Minimal Pairs
Probing studies of latent reasoning often read a model's state where the answer begins and take a failed probe as evidence that a value is absent. We test this with a digit copied from the question, in the looped model Ouro-1.4B and the standard transformer Qwen2.5-1.5B. Comparing prompts that diffe
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LSR-Ben: A Logical and Scientific Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Process Reward Models#1143744
- Agents' Last Doubt: Knowing When to Act and When to Step Back in Tool-Using Agents#1388760
- Wait, Wait, Wait... Why Do Reasoning Models Loop?#670446
- Wait, Wait, Wait... Why Do Reasoning Models Loop?#668381
- The One-Pixel of Reasoning: One Truthful Relation Is Enough to Mislead LLM Agents#1389819
Record · ID 1394244
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive