ConceptioArchiveNIST
NISTpublic full text

NIST SP 1800-40 ipd: Automation of the NIST Cryptographic Module Validation Program

Chris Celi (NIST); Alexander Calis (NIST); Murugiah Souppaya (NIST); William Barker (NIST); Karen Kent (Trusted Cyber Annex); Shawn Geddis (Katalyst); Raoul Gabiam (MITRE); Stephan Mueller (atsec); Yi Mao (atsec); Barry Fussell (Cisco); Andrew Karcher (Cisco); Douglas Boldt (AWS) · National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
NIST · Standards · License: Public Domain
Open Source ↗
cybersecuritypracticeimplementationguidenccoenist
cybersecurity practice, NCCoE, implementation guide, NIST

You are viewing this page in an unauthorized frame window. This is a potential security issue, you are being redirected to https://csrc.nist.gov . An official website of the United States government Here’s how you know Here’s how you know Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock Locked padlock icon ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Search Search CSRC MENU Search Search Projects Publications Expand or Collapse Drafts for Public Comment All Public Drafts Final Pubs FIPS (standards) Special Publications (SP s ) IR (interagency/internal reports) CSWP (cybersecurity white papers) ITL Bulletins Project Descriptions Journal Articles Conference Papers Books Topics Expand or Collapse Security & Privacy Applications Technologies Sectors Laws & Regulations Activities & Products News & Updates Events Glossary About CSRC Expand or Collapse Computer Security Division Cryptographic Technology Software Security Group Hardware Security Group Security Engineering and Risk Management Applied Cybersecurity Division Cybersecurity and Privacy Applications National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) Contact Us Information Technology Laboratory Computer Security Resource Center Publications NIST SP 1800-40 (Initial Public Draft) Automation of the NIST Cryptographic Module Validation Program Share to Facebook Share to X Share to LinkedIn Share ia Email Documentation Date Published: April 15, 2026 Comments Due: June 1, 2026 (public comment period is CLOSED) Email Questions to: [email protected] Author(s) Chris Celi (NIST) , Alexander Calis (NIST) , Murugiah Souppaya (NIST) , William Barker (NIST) , Karen Kent (Trusted Cyber Annex) , Shawn Geddis (Katalyst) , Raoul Gabiam (MITRE) , Stephan Mueller (atsec) , Yi Mao (atsec) , Barry Fussell (Cisco) , Andrew Karcher (Cisco) , Douglas Boldt (AWS) Announcement The NIST Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) is essential for organizations required to use validated cryptography – ensuring that hardware and software cryptographic implementations meet standard security requirements. The NCCoE has published the draft NIST SP 1800-40, Automation of the NIST Cryptographic Module Validation Program, to demonstrate how structured test evidence, standardized submission protocols, and modernized computing infrastructure can streamline the submission and review process. This publication is open for public comment through June 1, 2026 . Background NIST established the CMVP to ensure that hardware and software cryptographic implementations conform to specified security requirements. Since CMVP was established, the volume, complexity, and speed-to-market of cryptographic modules seeking validation have steadily increased. The rapid pace of innovation is exceeding the capacity of vendors, labs, and validation authorities to keep up with testing and validation. The NCCoE, in collaboration with the CMVP, is demonstrating the value of automation to improve the efficiency and timeliness of CMVP operations and processes. This publication provides details on the modernization effort, including automation of the testing and validation process, demonstration of protocols to accept and process module validation submissions, and an overview of the infrastructure changes to shift from an on-premises architecture to a cloud-native platform. This publication is intended to help testing labs, technology producers, and validation authorities streamline the validation process while maintaining and improving assurance levels. Comment Now! We encourage you to download the publication and submit your feedback by June 1, 2026 . While no further publication updates are planned, the team invites users to provide feedback on the areas where clarification might be beneficial. If you have any questions, you can reach out to the team at [email protected] . Abstract The Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) validates third-party assertions that cryptographic module implementations satisfy the requirements of Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 140-3, Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules. Historically, the CMVP validation review process has struggled to keep pace with the volume of cryptographic modules and accelerated software release cycles, contributing to delays in validation timelines. The NIST National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) has undertaken the Automated Cryptographic Module Validation Project (ACMVP) to explore how automation can improve the efficiency and timeliness of CMVP operations and processes. The project demonstrates how structured test evidence, standardized submission protocols, and supporting modernized computing infrastructure can streamline the submission and review of validation artifacts. This publication describes the approaches and tools demonstrated by the ACMVP team. The publication describes the results of an ACMVP Test Evidence (TE) Workstream and Protocol Workstream, as demonstrated in a laboratory environment developed by the project’s Research Infrastructure Workstream. The combined impact of these workstreams is intended to provide automation improvements to improve submission quality and enable a more efficient CMVP review process. The Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) validates third-party assertions that cryptographic module implementations satisfy the requirements of Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 140-3, Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules. Historically, the CMVP... See full abstract The Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) validates third-party assertions that cryptographic module implementations satisfy the requirements of Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 140-3, Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules. Historically, the CMVP validation review process has struggled to keep pace with the volume of cryptographic modules and accelerated software release cycles, contributing to delays in validation timelines. The NIST National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) has undertaken the Automated Cryptographic Module Validation Project (ACMVP) to explore how automation can improve the efficiency and timeliness of CMVP operations and processes. The project demonstrates how structured test evidence, standardized submission protocols, and supporting modernized computing infrastructure can streamline the submission and review of validation artifacts. This publication describes the approaches and tools demonstrated by the ACMVP team. The publication describes the results of an ACMVP Test Evidence (TE) Workstream and Protocol Workstream, as demonstrated in a laboratory environment developed by the project’s Research Infrastructure Workstream. The combined impact of these workstreams is intended to provide automation improvements to improve submission quality and enable a more efficient CMVP review process. Hide full abstract Keywords Automated Cryptographic Module Validation Project (ACMVP) ; Cryptographic Module Validation Program (CMVP) ; cryptography ; cryptographic module ; cryptographic module testing ; cryptographic module validation Control Families None selected Documentation Publication: NIST SP 1800-40B ipd Supplemental Material: Project homepage Document History: 04/15/26: SP 1800-40 (Draft) HEADQUARTERS 100 Bureau Drive Gaithersburg, MD 20899 X (link is external) facebook (link is external) linkedin (link is external) instagram (link is external) youtube (link is external) rss govdelivery (link is external) Want updates about CSRC and our publications? Subscribe Contact Us | Our Other Offices Send inquiries to [email protected] Site Privacy Accessibility Privacy Program Copyrights Vulnerability Disclosure No Fear Act Policy FOIA Environmental Policy Scientific Integrity Information Quality Standards Commerce.gov Science.gov USA.gov Vote.gov

Related documents

Record · ID 13964 · SHA-256 7a686b4c5148e39c
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.